Many Canadians are keenly aware of the froward plans behind the Security and Prosperity Partnership that was instituted in 2005 by the heads of Mexico, Canada and the United States. In Canada, the process of merging the regions is called "deep integration." The third SPP leaders summit will take place this August 21-22nd in Montebello, Quebec, not far from Ottawa.
'Deep integration' comes out of the shadows.
By Murray Dobbin, Vancouver
If the machinations going on in this country regarding so-called
"deep integration" were instead a communist conspiracy to take over the
country (you will, of course, have to try hard to imagine this) the
news media would be blaring the story.
{sidebar id=1}Pundits would pontificate, editorialists would erupt, security forces would be unleashed.
Instead, a virtual conspiracy to make the country disappear through assimilation into the U.S. gets barely a mention.
But news of the scheme -- formally called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP)
-- is finally breaking out of the secret chambers of the ruling elite
and the federal government. This is both good news and bad. It's good
that ordinary citizens are finally getting a glimpse of the betrayal of
their country. The news is bad because it reflects just how much of
this scheme is already being implemented.
Given the meetings of CEOs and politicians to advance the scheme
politically, as well as all that must go into its actual
implementation, there is simply too much activity to keep secret.
Ten dots to connect
Here are 10 developments in the plan to disappear Canada.
1) Pesticides 'harmonized.' The most thoroughly
reported story (though even this did not go much beyond the CanWest
chain) was the revelation that Canada was about to "harmonize"
its regulations, setting limits for pesticide residue on fruits and
vegetables. In 40 per cent of the cases, the U.S. allows for higher
levels. Richard Aucoin, chief registrar of the Pest Management
Regulatory Agency, which sets Canada's pesticide levels, said that
Canada's higher levels were a "trade irritant."
The downgrading of health protection had been a NAFTA initiative,
but is being "fast-tracked" as part of the Security and Prosperity
Partnership. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Some 300 regulatory
regimes are currently going through the same process.
2) Tory tirade. The next story that broke through
the wall of media silence reported on the paranoid reaction of the
Harper Conservatives to any criticism of the SPP. The occasion was
hearings of the Commons International Trade Committee into the SPP,
forced by the NDP.
Gordon Laxer, head of Alberta's Parkland Institute, was testifying
on the energy implications of the SPP, warning that eastern Canada
could end up "freezing in the dark." He had barely started when the
chair of the committee, Conservative MP Leon Benoit, demanded that
Laxer halt his "irrelevant" testimony. The Committee members overruled
Benoit -- who promptly (and illegally) adjourned the meeting and
stomped out. The NDP and Liberal members nonetheless continued without
him.
3) Council of corporate power. The SPP initiative
began in earnest back in 2002 with the Canadian Council of Chief
Executives (formerly the BCNI), the most powerful corporate body in the
country. It continues it leadership role, but does not promote the
scheme just in its own name. It instead has helped create several
supportive bodies that now help drive the agenda. Included in these are
the North American Competitive Council (NACC),
which includes CEOs of the largest North American corporations, and
which institutionalizes the exclusively corporate nature of the
agreement. The NACC is the only advisory group to the three NAFTA/SPP
governments.
4) Secretive summit. The NACC at least is public.
But much of what happens in building the elite consensus for deep
integration is done in absolute secrecy or very privately, away from
the prying eyes of the media. The most secretive of these was held last
year from Sept. 12 to 14, in Banff Springs. As The Tyee reported, the gathering was sponsored by something called the North American Forum* and it was attended by some of the most powerful members of the North American ruling elite.
Attendees, according to a leaked list that could not be confirmed,
included Donald Rumsfeld, George Schultz (former U.S. Secretary of
State), General Rick Hillier, Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor and
Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day. The media was not informed of
the meeting and it was first revealed by the weekly Banff Crag &
Canyon.
Stockwell Day refused to even confirm he was there, but said that
even if he was, it was a "private" meeting that he would not comment
on. There is no better indication that these meetings, and the SPP
itself, constitute a parallel governing structure -- unaccountable to
any democratic institution or the public.
5) 'No fly' coordination. Canada will have its own "no-fly" list just like our U.S. "partner."
As the Council of Canadians pointed out: "The no-fly list is very
much a Security and Prosperity Partnership initiative. 'The SPP Report
to Leaders, August 2006' outlines 105 SPP initiatives.
Initiative #93 states, 'Develop, test, evaluate and implement a plan to
establish comparable aviation passenger screening, and the screening of
baggage and air cargo (for North America).'"
Canada's privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart has raised a number
of concerns about the plan including the fact that the list will be
shared with the U.S., that "false positives" are a virtual certainty,
and that there is no evidence put forward by the government that the
list will improve airline security.
6) Bye, bye Canadian dollar? David Dodge, the head
of the Bank of Canada, told a Chicago audience that a single currency
for North America "is possible." That would see a big chunk of Canadian
sovereignty and the ability to guide the economy through monetary
policy go out the window. It's not the first time Dodge has mused about
abandoning the Canadian dollar - or deep integration.
7) Water and oil giveaways. The deep
integrationists clearly see Canadian water as a North American
resource, not a Canadian resource. At yet another very private meeting,
held in Calgary on April 27th under the auspices of yet another forum,
it was made clear that water is on the table for negotiation.
Discussion of bulk "water transfers" and diversions took place at a
Calgary meeting of the North American Future 2025 Project (partly
funded by the U.S. government). The meeting based its deliberations on
the false notion that Canada has 20 per cent of the world's fresh
water. Actual available supply amounts to only around six per cent --
about the same as has the U.S.
The water (and environment) meeting was preceded by another on April
26th talking about "North American" energy. The beneficiary of these
discussions is pretty clear when you realize Canada has no national
energy policy. We are the only energy exporting country in the world
without a one.
Gordon Laxer told the Parliamentary committee: "The National Energy
Board wrote me on April 12: 'Unfortunately, the NEB has not undertaken
any studies on security of supply.'" He was also told by the NEB that
Canada does not maintain a 90 day energy reserve as other developed
nations do. As Laxer points out, "Canada may be a net exporter, but it
still imports 40 per cent of its oil -- 850,000 barrels per day -- to
meet 90 per cent of Atlantic Canada's and Quebec's needs, and 40 per
cent of Ontario's."
Canada exports 63 per cent of its oil production and 56 per cent of its natural gas, percentages that can never decrease under NAFTA.
8) NAFTA Superhighway. State governments in the
U.S. are becoming increasingly alarmed at the prospects of deep
integration. Earlier this year, Idaho became the first state to pass a
legislative resolution directing the U.S. Congress to drop out of the
SPP, which is referred to as the North American Union amongst U.S. opponents.
Thirteen states in addition to Idaho are calling on Congress to abandon
the SPP: Georgia, Arizona, Missouri, Illinois, Oregon, Montana, South
Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, South Dakota, Tennessee, Washington and
Virginia.
Part of the opposition is focused on plans for a so-called NAFTA
Superhighway: actually a corridor several hundred metres wide including
rail lines, freeways and pipelines from Mexico to the Canadian border.
There is a growing grass roots movement against the SPP in the U.S.,
but led by the right over the issue of compromising American
sovereignty.
9) Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement (TILMA).
While U.S. states, concerned about state rights under an unaccountable
"North American Union," are organizing against the scheme, Canadian
provinces are either blithely unaware or knowingly complicit in the
deal. More Canadians may be aware of TILMA -- the investors' rights
agreement between B.C. and Albert -- than they are about the SPP, but
in reality they are one and the same.
TILMA is major piece of the deep integration, deregulation
imperative and fits hand in glove with the SPP. There is a similar,
though more informal, process evolving in the Atlantic provinces,
called "Atlantica." And B.C. is now pushing the so-called Gateway
Initiative, a kind of regional superhighway project that will see huge
and environmentally disastrous expansion of ports, highways and
pipelines to further supply the U.S.'s insatiable demand for resources
and cheap Asian goods.
10) The next SPP summit. The third leaders summit
on the SPP will take place this August 21-22nd in Montebello, Quebec,
not far from Ottawa. By the time it does many more Canadian will be
aware of it.
Part of the reason that news of the SPP/deep integration issue is
finally seeing the light of day is that opposition is growing and
groups fighting the SPP are having an impact. The Council of Canadians,
the CLC and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives held an SPP
teach-in in Ottawa last month and many civil society groups are now
taking deep integration to their members. Demonstrations are planned
for the summit. The NDP continues to press the government on SPP
secrecy and the Green Party's Elizabeth May has said deep integration
will be a focus of the party's election platform.
It is hard to think of any other issue in modern Canadian history,
especially one that will literally determine whether the country
survives or not, that has taken so long to get public attention. I
first wrote about it September, 2002.
By the time the SPP summit has come and gone and the fall political
season begins, deep integration, the most treacherous plan for the
country yet devised by Bay Street, will be increasingly exposed.
And by the next election, we could see a repeat of the great "free trade" election of 1988. This time we have to win.
------------------
Murray Dobbin is a Vancouver author and journalist whose latest book, Paul Martin: CEO for Canada? published by James Lorimer is in BC bookstores now. Murray can be reached at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
|